A Win For Test Cricket - December 14 (as featured in Tabla Singapore)

A Win for Test Cricket

In January 2011, when Michael Clarke was named the new Australian Captain in place of Ricky Ponting he announced his retirement from Twenty20 cricket to concentrate on the longer versions of the game. 

Fourteen of his 28 test hundreds came thereafter between 2011 and 2015 - including his highest test score of 329* versus India at Sydney.

In the case of Cheteshwar Pujara, it was a simple case of him not being endowed with anything that would make him "look good" on TV.  issue of him just not having anything that would make him “look good” on TV. No athletic demeanour, no trendy beard, no pony tail, no funky tattoos. 

His batting at times is even less exciting to watch than grass growing. This was patently visible in the Indian Premier League games he participated.

And yet, the greatness of his game lies in his humble acceptance of who he is and his commitment to stay true to his style - along with his immense powers of concentration.

It is that lost skill of batting in test matches, that proved once again last week how valuable it can be in difficult situations. It’s where a batsman’s strength is not his booming cover drive, but his meticulous judgement in leaving balls outside the off stump.

India made history on Monday by winning a tour-opening test in Australia. It is their 10^th visit down under and their 6^th win overall in 41 attempts there. It could not have happened if it weren’t for that one man: Cheteshwar Pujara.

If Dravid was called the wall, I like to call Pujara “The Anchor”.

Once again India had started a test series with little preparation and were 5 down for less than 100 in the first innings of the first test of an overseas tour this year. But that is where the script changed this time round, in Adelaide.

Pujara was like King Leonidas leading 300 Spartans to war against a Persian Army of 300,000. Or at least that is how it might have felt to him at 41-4 with Pat Cummins, Josh Hazlewood and Mitchell Starc in full flight with only the middle and lower order for company.

While everyone around him was swashbuckling their way back to the pavilion, he remained calm, collected and resolute. Slowly but surely, he wore the opposition down

His effort in the first innings lasted 246 balls yielding 123 runs - almost half of his teams score of 250. His match returns including the second innings an aggregate of 194 came from a staggering 393 balls, almost a third of the total faced by his team in the test match.

It was his partnerships of 45 with Rohit Sharma (37), 41 with Rishab Pant (25) and 62 with R Ashwin (25) that ensured India got out of jail and scored 250 - giving their bowlers something to work with.

Picking 4 bowlers to me is less conservative and more fraught with risk. It needs all of them to be on top of their game and at least one of them carrying a huge workload, which is difficult to sustain in a four or five test series. 

But once again the Indian bowling unit responded magnificently, as they have done all year round.

Ishant Sharma has been a revelation in 2018. His 33 wickets in 9 tests at an average of 22.03 and strike rate of 49.27 a far cry from a career average of 34.7 and a strike rate of 64.91. 

He is troubling top-order batsmen, bowling immaculate lines with radar like accuracy.

Bumrah is robotic. He is ‘mechanical efficiency’ combined with high levels of intelligence. If his body can hold up over the years, one will see him win many more matches for India. 

He is also a keen student of the game with a very mature head on his shoulders This makes him in my opinion a leadership candidate of the future.

The pick of the Indian bowlers for me however was R Ashwin. As much as I would love to see him in a more attacking role - conceding a few more runs and probably taking five wickets or more, he responded to his skippers ask of being stock bowler with incredible professionalism, and delivered great results.

I don’t think taking wickets was his job description for this test as much as it was keeping one end plugged. So any criticism of his numbers particularly in the wickets column is unwarranted.

Bowling a staggering 86.5 overs in two innings, with 22 maidens giving only 1.72 runs per over to pick 6 for 149 in the match is nothing short of a herculean effort.

However I don’t think this is sustainable, and more importantly, I do not believe it is what Ashwin is best meant to do. He is a match winner and needs to be given the same latitude as given to Nathan Lyon his opposite number. 

Unfortunately for India Ashwin wont figure in the second test starting at Perth today, as he has a side injury. Rohit is also out with a back injury. 

Thanks in large part to Ashwin’s effort, India were able to make up for the disappointment of Shami’s indifferent form in the first test. 

The medium pacer just does not look the part. His bowling is mostly inconsistent with intermittent flashes of brilliance. His batting an atrocious effort to say the least, and he looks like he doesn’t care.

Personally I am surprised he even made it into the XI ahead of Bhuvaneshwar Kumar. 

Having taken a lead of 15 runs in the first innings, one that had more of a psychological bearing, India needed to do a lot better than the first innings if they were going to win this test. 

Lokesh Rahul got out playing a terrible shot 6 short of what could have been a good 50. You think he would have learned something watching Rohit throw away a similar start of 37 in the first innings.

What was good however, was to see everyone that followed in the the top order willing to fight it out.

Kohli’s was a patient knock of 34, while Pujara was “The Anchor” once again. It was most heartening however to see Ajinkya Rahane finding form and playing "the shot of the match" -  cover driving Pat Cummins to the boundary.

He is the vice-captain of the team and his form is going to be vital to India’s chances in the series. It also takes a whole lot of pressure off Kohli - which in turn will allow Kohli to score more freely. 

India’s overall lead of 322 was eventually enough, but only just with the Australians getting to within 31 runs of the target, thanks mainly to the rearguard.

The contribution of India’s lower order of Ashwin, Shami, Ishant and and Bumrah is incredibly disconcerting. They scored 35 runs in the first innings and only 5 in the second! 

Compare that to the Australians produced - Cummins, Starc, Lyon and Hazlewood totalled 49 in the first innings and 107 in the second. This has been the story all year round.

Either it is the Indian tail that can’t bat to save their lives, or their bowlers are unable to wrap up their opponents lower order quickly. To me such a vast gap in runs will continue to hurt India and cost them games unless something is done about it, immediately. 

I had said that the Adelaide and Sydney pitches would offer India their best chance to win in this series in Australia. The Perth test will be tough but India can do well given that they have started on a winning note.

Despite missing the experienced David Warner and Steve Smith in their batting line up the Australian's gave an incredible account of their fighting abilities.Things will start to get more interesting if their top order starts to fire. I am hoping they do so sooner rather than later for it will make for more enthralling contests between the two sides.

The Adelaide match showed us how important it is to have top skills to play Test cricket. What a great advertisement it was for my favourite format of this amazing game.